1st guideline for research

Hypothesis:
A kinetic structure can be design to control sunlight and rain water in an open public space at the same time it reconfigures itself to provide a duality of open and closed space.

Applicable uses:

• Public squares
• Gardens
• Arenas
• Stations

Research Question:
Is it possible to create a 3D structure that can be stable in 3 different configurations* and that at the same time deals with sunlight and rain water control?

*These configurations are: closed, semi open and completely open (hidden).

Subquestions:
About main structure:

• Which kind of structure is more stable for this type of project?
• What is the most efficient way to reconfigure an entire structure?
• What is the exact position for the new configurations?
• What are the mechanical possibilities to achieve a reconfiguration?
• What kind of material is more suitable for this task?

About secondary structure (light and water features):

• How can a structure move in order to control light income?
• How can a structure deal with combined needs? (e.i. sun control+ventilation; rain+need of light; rain+ventilation, etc.)
• What kind of materials are available to create this features?
• What kind of material is more suitable to adapt into the structure?
• What are the machanical posibilities to achieve this movement?

Methodology:

1. Study the context and the site of the design.
2. Search for the reconfigurable structures available
3. Select the reconfiguration positions of the structure
4. Select the mechanical systems
5. Search for materials for main structure
6. Modeling of the structure
7. Structural analysis in different configurations
8. Search for daylight parameters and sun trajectory
9. Analysis of combined environmental factors (rain+light+ventilation)
10. Search for mechanism to control environmental factors
11. Search for materials for secondary structure
12. Modeling of the secondary structure
13. Light analisys (flux)

Software to be used:

• Structural analisys: Diana
• Daylight income: Ecotect
• Geometry creation: Generative Components

Aim of the kinetic structure

After having a clarifying chat with Michela, the main question arose: Why would I introduce a kinetic structure for solving an specific architectural problem?

The answer was found during the analysis of the site (context). I was thinking of a public square, where the need of shading and a temporary shelter should be needed in order to hold some public events, or purely to protect the people that gather in this place from sun and rain. Yesterday, Michela kindly offered a site to develop the structure: a public square in Bologna, Italy. This site enhace in some way the aim of the reseach. From my country background (Mexico) and from what I saw in Italy during a few months I was there, public squares are used to gather, people go to these places to meet other people and to socialize. So protecting this space to give a comfortable stay is one of the reasons.

In the other hand, people is familiarized with these spaces as open. So a big impact would be produced if a static structure is design. It can even make people to stop coming and enjoying the space.

Taking the above into account, the main objective of introducing a kinetic structure in a public square is to manage sunlight and rain water in order to bring a comfortable space to stay. This structure should be clever enough to keep the sence of outdoor space. Therefore two different movements where identifyied for the structure:

1. Small movement to control in an accurate way the light income, which entirely depends of the sun trajectory and the season; and to control rain water.

2. Big movement to completely open the structure and keep the sence of outdoor space. This movement can be achieved as Michela suggested by two means: Small accumulative movements or a single big scale movement. I think I still have to explore both possibilities.

Clearifying research question

Last monday February 9 the presentation about the research questions was done. In order to present this research question, some reduction of posibilities was done to get a quite an almost definitive research topic in which most all factors were defined.

Since I had 3 possible questions to search on structure and that at the same time they were interenting for me, I decided to extract from them the most meaningful part of each one (change configuration, self supporting and daylight), and tried to bring them into a single and global question:

Is it possible to create a 3D structure such that it can be stable in three different configurations without changing its elements?

In order to get this question answered in the right track, some delimitations have to be settled. The context on which I want to persue this topic is having the structure on an open space such as a square. This structure should serve as a canopy, providing shade to the people, and when changing configuration, letting direct daylight go through. So the main objective is to demonstrate that a single structure can be transformed in such a way that has multi-stable configurations and by this it can provide spatial quality* without decreasing efficiency.

In order to test this hypothesis, some parameters have to be defined. In this case, th following are considered:

1.The structure should open at least for 50% the span
2.Avoid disconnection of originally attached elements
3.Change from one shape to another (floor plan)

There are still some factors to be determined, such as the surface treatment, the waterproofment of the structure, the size of the structure and the square, and other that may arise while the search is being done. In this case I would appreciate if anybody can point out anyother element that hasn't been taken into account.

*For this case the spatial quiality will be daylight income.

Interests in architectural field

Eversince I decided to study architecture, I felt attraction for structural matters and how they could be integrated to a final design. Most of the architectural projects treat design and structure as separate elements and this last has to be adapted to fit in the design most of the times. As far as I conceive architecture, structure should play a significant role in the main piece and should also be attractive enough to contribute to the final outcome.

In search for a theme to research, I decided I would like to go deeper on the understanding of structres. After a few hours of thinking, I found three topics that are interesting to me, all related with the movement and the use of the least possible elements:

1. How could a solid structure open and close to let daylight go in without changing its form too much?

2. What kind of structure should be the most adequate to use in order to create a structure that is self supported?

3. How can a solid structure (such as beams or columns) move to completely change position without decreasing its efficiency during this process and create a new shape?

Hopefully at the end of this period I will find a solution for any of these matters.

Welcome

I finally decided to go for standUp architecture. What interests me the most is that anything can be possible for this lecture. This blog is going to be a diary of the evolution of my thoughts and the work done in order to developt a challenging architectural matter.